Science and Theology News
So I subscribe to weekly emailings from STN, and found this op-ed piece rather interesting in its critique of Behe, who wrote Darwin's Black Box:
http://www.stnews.org/commentary-2439.htm (Sorry, I don't know how to attach hyperlink to text on this thing, Ben).
Basically, it says that if ID wants to be like the Big Bang theory today (which also suffered early rejection because of it's "supernatural" implications), then it needs to actually have science confirm it. For now, it suffers from being essentially a negative critique of the "weak-links of evolution."
http://www.stnews.org/commentary-2439.htm (Sorry, I don't know how to attach hyperlink to text on this thing, Ben).
Basically, it says that if ID wants to be like the Big Bang theory today (which also suffered early rejection because of it's "supernatural" implications), then it needs to actually have science confirm it. For now, it suffers from being essentially a negative critique of the "weak-links of evolution."
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home